|
ColoradoRight 07-12-2007
But she only wants to kill him non-violently? Lethal injection? It just goes to show how political and unhinged the Nobel Peace Prize has become. If they could give one to a thief, thug, and murderer like Arafat - it really doesn't mean anything about peace.
Mushmaster25 07-13-2007 2.31am
Nothing has much real substantial meaning anymore. Try to look on the bright side though, its going to mean that the things that are substantial are going to mean allot more.
Righthand 07-13-2007 2.44am
“Right now, I could kill George Bush,” she said at the Adam’s Mark Hotel and Conference Center in Dallas. “No, I don’t mean that. How could you non-violently kill somebody? I would love to be able to do that.”
Get the impression that you don't like Arafat? He was a bit like Sharon, I suppose, but he was responsible for far less deaths. And he certainly was far far less corrupt than Sharon.
What was it now that stopped the peace breaking out then. Was it when Israel assassinated its own Nobel Peace Prize winner? That's a great discouragement to any future Zionist peace maker, don't you think? Must be why they've written that little incident of of history.
I'm sure that you would agree that the great American peace lady, Mrs Sheehan should be nominated for the peace prize as soon as you get rid of Bush. Seeing as you brought the subject up.
Cniq_cniq 07-13-2007 12.53pm
Except Sharon was not awarded the Nobel prize, so what is the point of your comparison?
Righthand 07-15-2007 2.14pm
Now, Sharon nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize! You must be joking? Who'd assassinate him then?
But she only wants to kill him non-violently? Lethal injection? It just goes to show how political and unhinged the Nobel Peace Prize has become. If they could give one to a thief, thug, and murderer like Arafat - it really doesn't mean anything about peace.
_________
Mushmaster25 07-13-2007 2.31am
Nothing has much real substantial meaning anymore. Try to look on the bright side though, its going to mean that the things that are substantial are going to mean allot more.
_____________
Righthand 07-13-2007 2.44am
“Right now, I could kill George Bush,” she said at the Adam’s Mark Hotel and Conference Center in Dallas. “No, I don’t mean that. How could you non-violently kill somebody? I would love to be able to do that.”
Get the impression that you don't like Arafat? He was a bit like Sharon, I suppose, but he was responsible for far less deaths. And he certainly was far far less corrupt than Sharon.
What was it now that stopped the peace breaking out then. Was it when Israel assassinated its own Nobel Peace Prize winner? That's a great discouragement to any future Zionist peace maker, don't you think? Must be why they've written that little incident of of history.
I'm sure that you would agree that the great American peace lady, Mrs Sheehan should be nominated for the peace prize as soon as you get rid of Bush. Seeing as you brought the subject up.
__________
Cniq_cniq 07-13-2007 12.53pm
Except Sharon was not awarded the Nobel prize, so what is the point of your comparison?
___________
Righthand 07-15-2007 2.14pm
Now, Sharon nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize! You must be joking? Who'd assassinate him then?
____________
No comments:
Post a Comment